The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on Keep and Bear
I’ve spoken with many anti-gun advocates and it’s often easy to spot their regurgitated rhetoric because they often use wrong terminology for what they are talking about, indicating they really don’t know what they are saying. A parrot can be trained to do the same thing.
I enjoy asking these parrots about some of the erroneous terminology they repeated and in doing so, I not only shoot down their argument but prove to them that they don’t have a clue what they are talking about.
TRENDING ON Keep And Bear
This is the case with a recent post published by the Washington Post. The author, Dana Milbank, obviously had no clue what he was talking about or reporting on. Milbank is just another anti-gun parrot.
Law-abiding gun owners are tired of reading articles from elitist writers who want nothing more than to eliminate gun ownership inpost was originally published on this site